Information
Author: María J. Cabrera-Álvarez
Version: B | 1.2Published: 2024-12-31
- minor editorial changes plus new side note "Commercial relevance"
WelfareScore | farm
The score card gives our welfare assessments for aquatic species in 10 criteria.
For each criterion, we score the probability to experience good welfare under minimal farming conditions ("Likelihood") and under high-standard farming conditions ("Potential") representing the worst and best case scenario. The third dimension scores how certain we are of our assessments based on the number and quality of sources we found ("Certainty").
The WelfareScore sums just the "High" scores in each dimension. Although good welfare ("High") seems not possible in some criteria, there could be at least a potential improvement from low to medium welfare (indicated by ➚ and the number of criteria).
- Li = Likelihood that the individuals of the species experience good welfare under minimal farming conditions
- Po = Potential of the individuals of the species to experience good welfare under high-standard farming conditions
➚ = potential improvements not reaching "High" - Ce = Certainty of our findings in Likelihood and Potential
WelfareScore = Sum of criteria scoring "High" (max. 10 per dimension)
General remarks
Silurus asotus is a catfish species that lives in Japan, east China, Mongolia, Russia, Korea, Vietnam, and Taiwan. It is cultivated in China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand. S. asotus lives for up to 12 years and reaches marketable size within a year. It lives in shallow waters of rivers and lakes, and it is commonly found in rice-fields, where it migrates to spawn. S. asotus has a complex mating ritual and does not reproduce naturally in captivity, maybe due to a lack of effort to simulate their natural environment during spawning season.
The welfare and survival of S. asotus in farms can be improved if measures are taken to prevent their aggressive and cannibalistic behaviour as well as to reduce their stress while in captivity, such as adding environmental enrichment, regular sizing, providing regular and abundant feeding, and reducing handling and environmental disturbances. Sizing becomes an arduous job due to females being larger than males, which increases the aggression rates from bigger to smaller IND. Some farms have tried to circumvent this problem by feminising males, but this measure generates malformations in the reproductive organs, which is detrimental for their welfare. Other farms breed sterile triploid IND to prevent them from investing energy in reproduction and prevent the negative natural impacts of possible escapes. Further research needs to be done to study the wild and farming conditions of S. asotus, especially in the areas of their social structure in the wild, specific stunning and slaughtering methods, and the measures taken in farms to provide them with their migration needs and to reduce their stress levels.
1 Home range
Many species traverse in a limited horizontal space (even if just for a certain period of time per year); the home range may be described as a species' understanding of its environment (i.e., its cognitive map) for the most important resources it needs access to.
What is the probability of providing the species' whole home range in captivity?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is medium for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.2 Depth range
Given the availability of resources (food, shelter) or the need to avoid predators, species spend their time within a certain depth range.
What is the probability of providing the species' whole depth range in captivity?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is medium for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a medium amount of evidence.3 Migration
Some species undergo seasonal changes of environments for different purposes (feeding, spawning, etc.), and to move there, they migrate for more or less extensive distances.
What is the probability of providing farming conditions that are compatible with the migrating or habitat-changing behaviour of the species?
It is unclear for minimal and high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.4 Reproduction
A species reproduces at a certain age, season, and sex ratio and possibly involving courtship rituals.
What is the probability of the species reproducing naturally in captivity without manipulation of these circumstances?
It is low for minimal and high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a high amount of evidence.5 Aggregation
Species differ in the way they co-exist with conspecifics or other species from being solitary to aggregating unstructured, casually roaming in shoals or closely coordinating in schools of varying densities.
What is the probability of providing farming conditions that are compatible with the aggregation behaviour of the species?
It is unclear for minimal and high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.6 Aggression
There is a range of adverse reactions in species, spanning from being relatively indifferent towards others to defending valuable resources (e.g., food, territory, mates) to actively attacking opponents.
What is the probability of the species being non-aggressive and non-territorial in captivity?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is medium for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a medium amount of evidence.7 Substrate
Depending on where in the water column the species lives, it differs in interacting with or relying on various substrates for feeding or covering purposes (e.g., plants, rocks and stones, sand and mud, turbidity).
What is the probability of providing the species' substrate and shelter needs in captivity?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is high for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a medium amount of evidence.8 Stress
Farming involves subjecting the species to diverse procedures (e.g., handling, air exposure, short-term confinement, short-term crowding, transport), sudden parameter changes or repeated disturbances (e.g., husbandry, size-grading).
What is the probability of the species not being stressed?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is medium for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.9 Malformations
Deformities that – in contrast to diseases – are commonly irreversible may indicate sub-optimal rearing conditions (e.g., mechanical stress during hatching and rearing, environmental factors unless mentioned in crit. 3, aquatic pollutants, nutritional deficiencies) or a general incompatibility of the species with being farmed.
What is the probability of the species being malformed rarely?
It is unclear for minimal and high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.10 Slaughter
The cornerstone for a humane treatment is that slaughter a) immediately follows stunning (i.e., while the individual is unconscious), b) happens according to a clear and reproducible set of instructions verified under farming conditions, and c) avoids pain, suffering, and distress.
What is the probability of the species being slaughtered according to a humane slaughter protocol?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is medium for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.Side note: Domestication
Teletchea and Fontaine introduced 5 domestication levels illustrating how far species are from having their life cycle closed in captivity without wild input, how long they have been reared in captivity, and whether breeding programmes are in place.
What is the species’ domestication level?
DOMESTICATION LEVEL 3 42, level 5 being fully domesticated.
Side note: Forage fish in the feed
450-1,000 milliard wild-caught fishes end up being processed into fish meal and fish oil each year which contributes to overfishing and represents enormous suffering. There is a broad range of feeding types within species reared in captivity.
To what degree may fish meal and fish oil based on forage fish be replaced by non-forage fishery components (e.g., poultry blood meal) or sustainable sources (e.g., soybean cake)?
All age classes: WILD: carnivorous 36 18. FARM: fish meal may be partly* replaced 43 44, fish oil may be completely* replaced by sustainable or non-forage fishery components 45 46, but no data found yet for ADULTS and SPAWNERS.
partly = <51% – mostly = 51-99% – completely = 100%
Side note: Commercial relevance
How much is this species farmed annually?
360,050 t/year 1990-2019 amounting to estimated 1,440,000,000 IND/year 1990-2019 47.
Glossary
DOMESTICATION LEVEL 3 = entire life cycle closed in captivity with wild inputs 42
FARM = setting in farming environment or under conditions simulating farming environment in terms of size of facility or number of individuals
FRY = larvae from external feeding on
IND = individuals
JUVENILES = fully developed but immature individuals
LAB = setting in laboratory environment
LARVAE = hatching to mouth opening
PHOTOPERIOD = duration of daylight
POTAMODROMOUS = migrating within fresh water
SPAWNERS = adults during the spawning season; in farms: adults that are kept as broodstock
WILD = setting in the wild
Bibliography
2 Nawang, Siti Umey Syahirah Mat, Ching Fui Fui, and Shigeharu Senoo. 2020. Biological Development and Growth of Amur Catfish, Silurus asotus Reared under Controlled Tropical Condition. Malaysian Applied Biology 49: 11–23.
3 Kim, Y. H., H. D. Kim, W. W. Lee, D. W. Lee, and B. H. Kim. 1990. Studies on the raising of four fish species in paddy field with growing rice. The Research Reports of the Rural Development Administration - Rice (Korea Republic).
4 Cruz, Catalino R. Dela. 1992. Rice-fish Research and Development in Asia. WorldFish.
5 The Fish Site. 2011. Changing Aquaculture Scene In Red River Delta, Viet Nam.
6 Kim, Seok Ryel, Jin Woo Jang, Bum Ju Kim, In Kwon Jang, Hyun Jeong Lim, and Su Kyoung Kim. 2019. Urban aquaculture of catfish, Silurus asotus, using biofloc and aquaponics systems. Environmental Biology Research 37: 545–553. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2019.37.4.545.
7 Kim, Jeong-Hui, Ju-Duk Yoon, Woo-Myung Heo, Dong-Sup Kim, Chulgoo Kim, and Min-Ho Jang. 2014. Movement patterns of three freshwater fish species after upstream transportation by fishway in the Jangheung Dam. Paddy and Water Environment 12: 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-014-0429-z.
8 Kang, Kyoung-Mi, and Hyeon-Ok Shin. 2010. Movement range and behavior of mandarin fish (Siniperca scherzeri) and catfish (Parasilurus asotus) in Chungju Lake [in Korean]. Bulletin of the Korean society of Fisheries Technology 46: 148–156. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2010.46.2.148.
9 Kumakura, Naoki, Kiyoshi Sakai, and Fumio Takashima. 2003. Reproductive cycle and human chorionic gonadotropininduced ovulation in hatchery reared Japanese catfish Silurus asotus. Fisheries science 69: 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00650.x.
10 Sariat, Sari Asfarina, Ching Fui Fui, and Shigeharu Senoo. 2020. Growth Performance and Gonad Maturation of Amur Catfish, Silurus asotus in Captivity. Malaysian Applied Biology 49: 71–79.
11 Arsin, Nur Efah, Abentin Estim, and Saleem Mustafa. 2018. Behaviour and Response of Japanese Catfish (Silurus asotus) in Captivity Provided with an Artificial Microhabitat Mosaic. Aquatic Research: 136–139. https://doi.org/10.3153/AR18015.
12 Miwa, Takeshi, Goro Yoshizaki, Hiroaki Naka, Michitoshi Nakatani, Kiyoshi Sakai, Makito Kobayashi, and Toshio Takeuchi. 2001. Ovarian steroid synthesis during oocyte maturation and ovulation in Japanese catfish (Silurus asotus). Aquaculture 198: 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00586-X.
13 Wang, Qidong, Lin Cheng, Jiashou Liu, Zhongjie Li, Shouqi Xie, and Sena S De Silva. 2014. Freshwater aquaculture in PR China: trends and prospects. Reviews in Aquaculture: 20.
14 Yu, Jin-Ha, Jung Jo Han, Kwon Sam Park, Kwan Ha Park, and Sung Woo Park. 2009. Edwardsiella tarda infection in Korean catfish, Silurus asotus, in a Korean fish farm. Aquaculture Research 41: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02296.x.
15 Maehata, Masayoshi. 2002. Stereotyped sequence of mating behavior in the Far Eastern catfish, Silurus asotus , from Lake Biwa. Ichthyological Research 49: 202–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102280200028.
16 Funao, Toshinori, Takayoshi Nishida, Yoshimasa Kurashige, and Hiroichi Sawada. 2014. Different suitability of improved irrigation channels as reproductive sites for Cyprininae and Silurus asotus. Scientific Reports 4: 3588. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03588.
17 Shirai, Nobuya, Hiramitsu Suzuki, Shigeru Toukairin, and Shun Wada. 2001. Spawning and season affect lipid content and fatty acid composition of ovary and liver in Japanese catfish (Silurus asotus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 129: 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00378-5.
18 Dulmaa, A. 1999. Fish and Fisheries in Mongolia. In Fish and Fisheries at Higher Altitudes: Asia, ed. T. Petr, 187–236. Rome: Food & Agriculture Org. of the United Nations.
19 Maehata, Masayoshi. 2007. Reproductive ecology of the Far Eastern catfish, Silurus asotus (Siluridae), with a comparison to its two congeners in Lake Biwa, Japan. Environmental Biology of Fishes 78: 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9083-7.
20 Mashiko, K. 1981. Periodic nocturnal activities in the catfish Silurus asotus in captivity. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 28: 148–156. https://doi.org/10.11369/jji1950.28.148.
21 Tabata, M., Mitsuo, Maung Minh-Nyo, Hiroshi Niwa, and Mikio Oguri. 1989. Circadian Rhythm of Locomotor Activity in a Teleost, Silurus asotus. Zoological Science 6: 367–375.
22 Tabata Mitsuo, Minh-Nyo Maung, and Oguri Mikio. 1991. The Role of the Eyes and the Pineal Organ in the Circadian Rhythmicity in the Catfish Silurus asotus. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 57: 607–612. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.57.607.
23 Hata, Kenji. 2002. Field Experiment on the Migration of Fishes to a Paddy Field with a Small Fishway. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ 36: 219–225. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.36.219.
24 Inaba, D. 1976. Freshwater Aquaculture. Tokyo: Koseisha Koseikaku.
25 Katano Osamu, Saitoh Kenji, and Koizumi Akio. 1988. Scatter-spawning of the catfish,Silurus asotus. Ichthyological Research 35: 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905407.
26 Gao, Yang, Sun-Gyu Kim, and Jeong-Yeol Lee. 2011. Effects of pH on Fertilization and the Hatching Rates of Far Eastern Catfish Silurus asotus. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 14: 417–420. https://doi.org/10.5657/FAS.2011.0417.
27 Park, In-Seok. 2019. The Anesthetic Effects of Clove Oil and MS-222 on Far Eastern Catfish, Silurus asotus. Development & Reproduction 23: 183–191. https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2019.23.2.183.
28 Yada, Osamu, and Atsushi Furukawa. Relationship between External and Internal Morphological Changes and Feeding Habits in the Fry Stage of Japanese Catfish Silurus asotus. UJNR Technical Report 28.
29 The Shiga Society of Naturalists. 2001. Flora And Fauna Of Rural Biotopes In Shiga. Shiga, Japan: Sunrise-syuppan.
30 Saito, Saburo, and Kaname Yokoi. 1955. On the Fresh Water Catfish, Parasilurus asotus (Linnaeus) from Hokkaido. 北海道大學水産學部研究彙報 5: 336–337.
31 Miyadi, D., H. Kawanabe, and N. Mizuno. 1976. Coloured illustrations of the freshwater fishes of Japan. Hoikusha, Osaka: Japanese.
32 Hur, Jun Wook, Dae Hee Kim, and Jeong-Yeol Lee. 2015. Physiological Responses to Three Different Levels of Vibration Stress in Catfish, Silurus asotus. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 2: 337–344. https://doi.org/10.17820/ERI.2015.2.4.337.
33 Hur, Jun Wook, Jeong Yeol Lee, and Jin Chul Joo. 2018. Effects of Noise and Vibration on Oxygen Consumption and Ammonia Excretion in Cultured Catfish (Silurus asotus). Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 5: 105–109. https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2018.5.2.105.
34 Baron, V. D., and V. M. Olshansky. 2009. Monopolar electric discharges of the catfish Parasilurus asotus (Siluridae, Siluriformes). Journal of Ichthyology 49: 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945209050063.
35 Hatai, Shinkishi, and Noboru Abe. 1932. The Responses of the Catfish, Parasilurus Asotus, to Earthquakes. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy 8: 375–378. https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab1912.8.375.
36 Yang, Won Seok, Hyun Woo Gil, Gwang Yeol Yoo, and In-Seok Park. 2015. Identification of Skeletal Deformities in Far Eastern Catfish, Silurus asotus under Indoor Aquaculture Condition. Development & Reproduction 19: 153–161. https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.153.
37 Humane Slaughter Association. 2018. Humane slaughter of finfish farmed around the world. Humane Slaughter Association.
38 Bowan, Jennifer, and Albin Gräns. 2019. Stunning and Killing of Tropical and Subtropical Finfish in Aquaculture during Slaughter.
39 Lambooij, E, R J Kloosterboer, C Pieterse, M A Gerritzen, and J W Van de vis. 2003. Stunning of farmed African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) using a captive needle pistol; assessment of welfare aspects. Aquaculture Research 34: 1353–1358. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2003.00966.x.
40 Sattari, A., E. Lambooij, H. Sharifi, W. Abbink, H. Reimert, and J. W. van de Vis. 2010. Industrial dry electro-stunning followed by chilling and decapitation as a slaughter method in Claresse® (Heteroclarias sp.) and African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Aquaculture 302: 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.01.011.
41 Lambooij, E., R. J. Kloosterboer, M. A. Gerritzen, and J. W. van de Vis. 2006. Assessment of electrical stunning in fresh water of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and chilling in ice water for loss of consciousness and sensibility. Aquaculture 254: 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.10.027.
42 Teletchea, Fabrice, and Pascal Fontaine. 2012. Levels of domestication in fish: implications for the sustainable future of aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries 15: 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12006.
43 Kim, Kyoung-Duck, Sang-Gu Lim, Ju-Ae Hwang, Jin-Do Kim, and Yong-Jin Kang. 2009. Evaluation of Soybean Meal as a Partial Substitute for Fish Meal in Diet and Experimental Practical Diet for Growth in the Far Eastern Catfish (Silurus asotus). Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42: 349–353. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2009.42.4.349.
44 Katya, Kumar, Yong-hyun Yun, Gunhyun Park, Jeong-Yeol Lee, Gwangyeol Yoo, and Sungchul C. Bai. 2014. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Fermented By-product of Mushroom, Pleurotus ostreatus, as a Fish Meal Replacer in Juvenile Amur Catfish, Silurus asotus: Effects on Growth, Serological Characteristics and Immune Responses. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27: 1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14038.
45 Kim, Kyoung-Duck, Jin-Do Kim, Sang-Gu Lim, Yong-Jin Kang, and Maeng-Hyun Son. 2010. Effects of Dietary Lipid Sources on the Growth and Body Composition of the far Eastern Catfish, Silurus asotus. Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43: 445–450. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2010.43.5.445.
46 Asdari, Roslianah, Amal Biswas, Shinichi Yamamoto, Hideo Araki, Ken Kawashima, Roshada Hashim, and Kenji Takii. 2014. Effect of Dietar y Palm Oil and Medium Chain Triglycerides on Growth and Fatty Acid Profiles of Japanese Catfish Silurus asotus Juveniles. Aquaculture Science 62: 45–54. https://doi.org/10.11233/aquaculturesci.62.45.
47 Mood, Alison, Elena Lara, Natasha K. Boyland, and Phil Brooke. 2023. Estimating global numbers of farmed fishes killed for food annually from 1990 to 2019. Animal Welfare 32: e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.4.
Lorem ipsum
Something along the lines of: we were aware of the importance of some topics so that we wanted to include them and collect data but not score them. For WelfareChecks | farm, these topics are "domestication level", "feed replacement", and "commercial relevance". The domestication and commercial relevance aspects allow us to analyse the questions whether increasing rate of domestication or relevance in farming worldwide goes hand in hand with better welfare; the feed replacement rather goes in the direction of added suffering for all those species which end up as feed. For a carnivorous species, to gain 1 kg of meat, you do not just kill this one individual but you have to take into account the meat that it was fed during its life in the form of fish meal and fish oil. In other words, carnivorous species (and to a degree also omnivorous ones) have a larger "fish in:fish out" ratio.
Lorem ipsum
Probably, we updated the profile. Check the version number in the head of the page. For more information on the version, see the FAQ about this. Why do we update profiles? Not just do we want to include new research that has come out, but we are continuously developing the database itself. For example, we changed the structure of entries in criteria or we added explanations for scores in the WelfareCheck | farm. And we are always refining our scoring rules.
The centre of the Overview is an array of criteria covering basic features and behaviours of the species. Each of this information comes from our literature search on the species. If we researched a full Dossier on the species, probably all criteria in the Overview will be covered and thus filled. This was our way to go when we first set up the database.
Because Dossiers are time consuming to research, we switched to focusing on WelfareChecks. These are much shorter profiles covering just 10 criteria we deemed important when it comes to behaviour and welfare in aquaculture (and lately fisheries, too). Also, WelfareChecks contain the assessment of the welfare potential of a species which has become the main feature of the fair-fish database over time. Because WelfareChecks do not cover as many criteria as a Dossier, we don't have the information to fill all blanks in the Overview, as this information is "not investigated by us yet".
Our long-term goal is to go back to researching Dossiers for all species covered in the fair-fish database once we set up WelfareChecks for each of them. If you would like to support us financially with this, please get in touch at ffdb@fair-fish.net
See the question "What does "not investigated by us yet" mean?". In short, if we have not had a look in the literature - or in other words, if we have not investigated a criterion - we cannot know the data. If we have already checked the literature on a criterion and could not find anything, it is "no data found yet". You spotted a "no data found yet" where you know data exists? Get in touch with us at ffdb@fair-fish.net!
Once you have clicked on "show details", the entry for a criterion will unfold and display the summarised information we collected from the scientific literature – complete with the reference(s).
As reference style we chose "Springer Humanities (numeric, brackets)" which presents itself in the database as a number in a grey box. Mouse over the box to see the reference; click on it to jump to the bibliography at the bottom of the page. But what does "[x]-[y]" refer to?
This is the way we mark secondary citations. In this case, we read reference "y", but not reference "x", and cite "x" as mentioned in "y". We try to avoid citing secondary references as best as possible and instead read the original source ourselves. Sometimes we have to resort to citing secondarily, though, when the original source is: a) very old or not (digitally) available for other reasons, b) in a language no one in the team understands. Seldomly, it also happens that we are running out of time on a profile and cannot afford to read the original. As mentioned, though, we try to avoid it, as citing mistakes may always happen (and we don't want to copy the mistake) and as misunderstandings may occur by interpreting the secondarily cited information incorrectly.
If you spot a secondary reference and would like to send us the original work, please contact us at ffdb@fair-fish.net
In general, we aim at giving a good representation of the literature published on the respective species and read as much as we can. We do have a time budget on each profile, though. This is around 80-100 hours for a WelfareCheck and around 300 hours for a Dossier. It might thus be that we simply did not come around to reading the paper.
It is also possible, though, that we did have to make a decision between several papers on the same topic. If there are too many papers on one issue than we manage to read in time, we have to select a sample. On certain topics that currently attract a lot of attention, it might be beneficial to opt for the more recent papers; on other topics, especially in basic research on behaviour in the wild, the older papers might be the go-to source.
And speaking of time: the paper you are missing from the profile might have come out after the profile was published. For the publication date, please check the head of the profile at "cite this profile". We currently update profiles every 6-7 years.
If your paper slipped through the cracks and you would like us to consider it, please get in touch at ffdb@fair-fish.net
This number, for example "C | 2.1 (2022-11-02)", contains 4 parts:
- "C" marks the appearance – the design level – of the profile part. In WelfareChecks | farm, appearance "C" is our most recent one with consistent age class and label (WILD, FARM, LAB) structure across all criteria.
- "2." marks the number of major releases within this appearance. Here, it is major release 2. Major releases include e.g. changes of the WelfareScore. Even if we just add one paper – if it changes the score for one or several criteria, we will mark this as a major update for the profile. With a change to a new appearance, the major release will be re-set to 1.
- ".1" marks the number of minor updates within this appearance. Here, it is minor update 1. With minor updates, we mean changes in formatting, grammar, orthography. It can also mean adding new papers, but if these papers only confirm the score and don't change it, it will be "minor" in our book. With a change to a new appearance, the minor update will be re-set to 0.
- "(2022-11-02)" is the date of the last change – be it the initial release of the part, a minor, or a major update. The nature of the changes you may find out in the changelog next to the version number.
If an Advice, for example, has an initial release date and then just a minor update date due to link corrections, it means that – apart from correcting links – the Advice has not been updated in a major way since its initial release. Please take this into account when consulting any part of the database.
Lorem ipsum
In the fair-fish database, when you have chosen a species (either by searching in the search bar or in the species tree), the landing page is an Overview, introducing the most important information to know about the species that we have come across during our literatures search, including common names, images, distribution, habitat and growth characteristics, swimming aspects, reproduction, social behaviour but also handling details. To dive deeper, visit the Dossier where we collect all available ethological findings (and more) on the most important aspects during the life course, both biologically and concerning the habitat. In contrast to the Overview, we present the findings in more detail citing the scientific references.
Depending on whether the species is farmed or wild caught, you will be interested in different branches of the database.
Farm branch
Founded in 2013, the farm branch of the fair-fish database focuses on farmed aquatic species.
Catch branch
Founded in 2022, the catch branch of the fair-fish database focuses on wild-caught aquatic species.
The heart of the farm branch of the fair-fish database is the welfare assessment – or WelfareCheck | farm – resulting in the WelfareScore | farm for each species. The WelfareCheck | farm is a condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good welfare in aquaculture, based on welfare-related findings for 10 crucial criteria (home range, depth range, migration, reproduction, aggregation, aggression, substrate, stress, malformations, slaughter).
For those species with a Dossier, we conclude to-be-preferred farming conditions in the Advice | farm. They are not meant to be as detailed as a rearing manual but instead, challenge current farming standards and often take the form of what not to do.
In parallel to farm, the main element of the catch branch of the fair-fish database is the welfare assessment – or WelfareCheck | catch – with the WelfareScore | catch for each species caught with a specific catching method. The WelfareCheck | catch, too, is a condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good welfare – or better yet avoidance of decrease of good welfare – this time in fisheries. We base this on findings on welfare hazards in 10 steps along the catching process (prospection, setting, catching, emersion, release from gear, bycatch avoidance, sorting, discarding, storing, slaughter).
In contrast to the farm profiles, in the catch branch we assess the welfare separately for each method that the focus species is caught with. In the case of a species exclusively caught with one method, there will be one WelfareCheck, whereas in other species, there will be as many WelfareChecks as there are methods to catch the species with.
Summarising our findings of all WelfareChecks | catch for one species in Advice | catch, we conclude which catching method is the least welfare threatening for this species and which changes to the gear or the catching process will potentially result in improvements of welfare.
Try mousing over the element you are interested in - oftentimes you will find explanations this way. If not, there will be FAQ on many of the sub-pages with answers to questions that apply to the respective sub-page. If your question is not among those, contact us at ffdb@fair-fish.net.
It's right here! We decided to re-name it to fair-fish database for several reasons. The database has grown beyond dealing purely with ethology, more towards welfare in general – and so much more. Also, the partners fair-fish and FishEthoGroup decided to re-organise their partnership. While maintaining our friendship, we also desire for greater independence. So, the name "fair-fish database" establishes it as a fair-fish endeavour.