Farming remarks
Acipenser baerii (Siberian sturgeon) is a member of the family Acipenseridae. It is a large, long-lived species. Historically, it ranged across major Siberian basins (e.g., Ob–Irtysh, Yenisei, Lena, and others) and lakes (e.g., Baikal), with some populations inhabiting brackish estuaries. Wild populations have declined strongly, mainly due to overfishing for caviar and due to the construction of dams that block the natural spawning migration. There is uncertainty related to wild ecology, as the natural habitat is limited to remote areas, where field studies have not been conducted since the ‘80s.
It is currently farmed around the world, mainly for the eggs (caviar), secondarily for the meat, depending on each country’s internal market. For this reason, its aquaculture focuses on rearing IND for a long period of time (6-7 years) in big tanks, cages, or earthen ponds until sexual maturity is reached and it is possible to collect the eggs by slaughtering the IND. To this end, hormonal implants and invasive monitoring techniques are widespread in order to maximise egg production. IND destined for meat production are slaughtered earlier.
The WelfareScore is low due to the species’ migratory behaviour and the widespread use of artificial reproduction procedures. For JUVENILES, the available rearing substrate may be adequate, and mitigation strategies to reduce stress have been tested. In contrast, procedures and facilities used during the spawning phase often sacrifice welfare in order to optimise egg production. Improving welfare for SPAWNERS and researching natural spawning could deliver the highest welfare payoff. Manuals and studies report little to no inter-individual aggression in farms, but it still needs direct empirical confirmation. Malformation rates are described as low, and good slaughter protocols are available. At the same time, the lack of tagging and field studies in the wild creates high uncertainty about the spatial and social needs of A. baerii in the wild. New research on wild behaviour with modern tracking techniques is critically needed.
For details see: WelfareCheck | farm (latest major release: 2026-03-30)
Related news
2026 will be the sturgeon year for the fair-fish database. We cover 7 sturgeons whose WelfareChecks all need an update. First up: Acipenser baerii, the Siberian sturgeon. Sturgeons are mostly reared for their eggs (caviar), and A. baerii is no exception, even though selling it for its meat is also possible regionally.
As the presumably most frequently farmed one of the list, it is all the more surprising that there are a lot of knowledge gaps about wild needs of A. baerii. Especially spatial and social requirements are hard to gauge and so make it difficult to score the possibilities for good welfare in captivity. After having to wait 6 or 7 years until the individuals mature, farmers don't leave reproduction to chance: Everything surrounding ovulation and spawning is highly artificial and stressful. As a carnivorous species, it requires fish meal and fish oil in the diet even if partial replacement has been tested.
Nevertheless, our WelfareScore increased slightly since 2017. This is due to the calm nature of the species (at least after the fry stage), the generally low rate of malformations, and an existing slaughter protocol. Additionally, substrate needs are met if raised in earthen ponds (just not for spawners), and there are recommendations for reducing (if not avoiding) stress.
Do you concur with our findings? Do you have sources to fill the knowledge gaps? Please contact us.
The centre of the Overview is an array of criteria covering basic features and behaviours of the species. Each of this information comes from our literature search on the species. If we researched a full Dossier on the species, probably all criteria in the Overview will be covered and thus filled. This was our way to go when we first set up the database.
Because Dossiers are time consuming to research, we switched to focusing on WelfareChecks. These are much shorter profiles covering just 10 criteria we deemed important when it comes to behaviour and welfare in aquaculture (and lately fisheries, too). Also, WelfareChecks contain the assessment of the welfare potential of a species which has become the main feature of the fair-fish database over time. Because WelfareChecks do not cover as many criteria as a Dossier, we don't have the information to fill all blanks in the Overview, as this information is "not investigated by us yet".
Our long-term goal is to go back to researching Dossiers for all species covered in the fair-fish database once we set up WelfareChecks for each of them. If you would like to support us financially with this, please get in touch at ffdb@fair-fish.net
See the question "What does "not investigated by us yet" mean?". In short, if we have not had a look in the literature - or in other words, if we have not investigated a criterion - we cannot know the data. If we have already checked the literature on a criterion and could not find anything, it is "no data found yet". You spotted a "no data found yet" where you know data exists? Get in touch with us at ffdb@fair-fish.net!
First up, you will find answers to questions for the specific page you are on. Scrolling down in the FAQ window, there are also answers to more general questions. Explore our website and the other sub pages and find there the answers to questions relevant for those pages.
In the fair-fish database, when you have chosen a species (either by searching in the search bar or in the species tree), the landing page is an Overview, introducing the most important information to know about the species that we have come across during our literatures search, including common names, images, distribution, habitat and growth characteristics, swimming aspects, reproduction, social behaviour but also handling details. To dive deeper, visit the Dossier where we collect all available ethological findings (and more) on the most important aspects during the life course, both biologically and concerning the habitat. In contrast to the Overview, we present the findings in more detail citing the scientific references.
Depending on whether the species is farmed or wild caught, you will be interested in different branches of the database.
Farm branch
Founded in 2013, the farm branch of the fair-fish database focuses on farmed aquatic species.
Catch branch
Founded in 2022, the catch branch of the fair-fish database focuses on wild-caught aquatic species.
The heart of the farm branch of the fair-fish database is the welfare assessment – or WelfareCheck | farm – resulting in the WelfareScore | farm for each species. The WelfareCheck | farm is a condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good welfare in aquaculture, based on welfare-related findings for 10 crucial criteria (home range, depth range, migration, reproduction, aggregation, aggression, substrate, stress, malformations, slaughter).
For those species with a Dossier, we conclude to-be-preferred farming conditions in the Advice | farm. They are not meant to be as detailed as a rearing manual but instead, challenge current farming standards and often take the form of what not to do.
In parallel to farm, the main element of the catch branch of the fair-fish database is the welfare assessment – or WelfareCheck | catch – with the WelfareScore | catch for each species caught with a specific catching method. The WelfareCheck | catch, too, is a condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good welfare – or better yet avoidance of decrease of good welfare – this time in fisheries. We base this on findings on welfare hazards in 10 steps along the catching process (prospection, setting, catching, emersion, release from gear, bycatch avoidance, sorting, discarding, storing, slaughter).
In contrast to the farm profiles, in the catch branch we assess the welfare separately for each method that the focus species is caught with. In the case of a species exclusively caught with one method, there will be one WelfareCheck, whereas in other species, there will be as many WelfareChecks as there are methods to catch the species with.
Summarising our findings of all WelfareChecks | catch for one species in Advice | catch, we conclude which catching method is the least welfare threatening for this species and which changes to the gear or the catching process will potentially result in improvements of welfare.
Welfare of aquatic species is at the heart of the fair-fish database. In our definition of welfare, we follow Broom (1986): “The welfare of an individual is its state as regards its attempts to cope with its environment.” Thus, welfare may be perceived as a continuum on which an individual rates “good” or “poor” or everything in between.
We pursue what could be called a combination of not only a) valuing the freedom from injuries and stress (function-based approach) but b) supporting attempts to provide rewarding experiences and cognitive challenges (feelings-based approach) as well as c) arguing for enclosures that mimic the wild habitat as best as possible and allow for natural behaviour (nature-based approach).
Try mousing over the element you are interested in - oftentimes you will find explanations this way. If not, there will be FAQ on many of the sub-pages with answers to questions that apply to the respective sub-page. If your question is not among those, contact us at ffdb@fair-fish.net.
It's right here! We decided to re-name it to fair-fish database for several reasons. The database has grown beyond dealing purely with ethology, more towards welfare in general – and so much more. Also, the partners fair-fish and FishEthoGroup decided to re-organise their partnership. While maintaining our friendship, we also desire for greater independence. So, the name "fair-fish database" establishes it as a fair-fish endeavour.

