Dossier:
not provided by us yet
WelfareCheck:
C (2024-01-25)
Advice:
not provided by us yet
Profile status
Taxonomy
Ethograms
In the wild:
not investigated by us yet
Farm/lab:
not investigated by us yet
Catch/lab:
no data found yet
Habitat
Temperature:
not investigated by us yet
Photoperiod:
not investigated by us yet
Substrate:
not investigated by us yet
Growth
Length:
not investigated by us yet
Weight:
not investigated by us yet
Maturity:
not investigated by us yet
Malformations:
not investigated by us yet
Swimming
Home range:
not investigated by us yet
Depth:
not investigated by us yet
Migration:
not investigated by us yet
Activity type:
not investigated by us yet
Reproduction
Nest building:
not investigated by us yet
Courtship:
not investigated by us yet
Mating type:
not investigated by us yet
Brood care:
not investigated by us yet
Handling
Catching remarks
Scomber colias is one of the most important commercial species throughout its habitat. It is fished mainly on the eastern side of the Atlantic (Bay of Biscay to South Africa) as well as in the Mediterranean, mostly in purse seine and pelagic trawl fisheries which target Sardina pilchardus and/or Engraulis engrasicolus. Often being bycatch (and then slipped), it may become the target species when it is highly available whereas sardine and anchovy are not. Another reason contributing to the recent rise in landings is the appearance of new markets (e.g., for tuna feeding). Tuna are among the natural predators together with swordfish, sharks, dolphins, and seals, so these risk becoming bycatch themselves when they are accidentally engulfed by the purse seine – just as other pelagic and semi- pelagic species may be accidentally caught.
The medium-sized pelagic S. colias may already suffer from injuries and stress when the purse seine is hauled close to the ship. Whether slipping of unwanted catch results in delayed mortality requires further research; discarding – once on board – is mostly done when the IND are dead and so should be avoided. Transfer to the storage space via scoop net potentially subjects wanted S. colias to further crowding, contact with the gear, lack of oxygen, and experience of its own weight. Storing most likely happens alive and without or with only little ice. And since death occurs most likely through asphyxia, the best would be pumping the IND on board and then immediately stun them followed by slaughter while still unconscious. Further research is needed for such a protocol.
For details see: WelfareCheck | catch (pre-release)
Related news
2025-12-03: Turning the purse seine method profile into a peer-reviewed paper
In our ongoing effort to make the database more known, we have recently published in "Fishes", a peer-reviewed journal! We are putting a lot of effort into creating WelfareChecks – and now also method profiles – in the fair-fish database. We are applying a comprehensive approach using sources from peer-reviewed papers to grey literature like YouTube videos, university theses, and governmental reports. We do have an internal review process involving experts in our team, but inviting external reviewers has failed in the past. Therefore, the purpose of publishing in scientific journals is to make the fair-fish database known in larger scientific circles and get feedback by the community through the peer-review process.
In this latest paper, we focused on the method profile of "purse seines" on four small pelagic species that are among the most frequently caught worldwide. The review is not only a look into the welfare-relevant data gathered and critically analysed in the fair-fish database; it also offers an overview of a holistic approach suggested to apply this scientific knowledge in practice by involving practitioners, technology, and economic concerns.
Please find the paper in the Fishes journal under the link provided in the beginning – it is open access! Alternatively, feel free to browse our Publications page where you will find this and previously published peer-reviewed papers from our team as well as non-peer-reviewed manuscripts and the profiles published in the fair-fish database.
2024-01-25: New WelfareCheck | catch: Scomber colias x purse seines
Our third WelfareCheck | catch is online – that of Scomber colias (Atlantic chub mackerel) caught with purse seines. Scomber colias often is second choice after Sardina pilchardus (European pilchard) or other small- and medium-sized pelagic species and then is even slipped for being unwanted. Yet, when these other species are scarce or it is prohibited to catch them, Scomber colias can become targeted to a high degree.
Maybe this situation of being second best in the eyes of fishing folks is the reason we could hardly find research on welfare for this species during the catching process. It nevertheless became clear during the literature search that the species potentially suffers already during hauling the purse seine and then especially after scooping it out. Recommendations how to improve the situation are urgently needed, probably involving immediate stunning once on deck followed by slaughter while still unconscious. If you have more information for us, please let us know!
Scomber colias
❮
❯
1 / 5
2 / 5
3 / 5
4 / 5
5 / 5
good point
good point from country record
non-good point
non-good point from country record
Profile
What does "not investigated by us yet" mean?
The centre of the Overview is an array of criteria covering basic features and behaviours of the species. Each of this information comes from our literature search on the species. If we researched a full Dossier on the species, probably all criteria in the Overview will be covered and thus filled. This was our way to go when we first set up the database.
Because Dossiers are time consuming to research, we switched to focusing on WelfareChecks. These are much shorter profiles covering just 10 criteria we deemed important when it comes to behaviour and welfare in aquaculture (and lately fisheries, too). Also, WelfareChecks contain the assessment of the welfare potential of a species which has become the main feature of the fair-fish database over time. Because WelfareChecks do not cover as many criteria as a Dossier, we don't have the information to fill all blanks in the Overview, as this information is "not investigated by us yet".
Our long-term goal is to go back to researching Dossiers for all species covered in the fair-fish database once we set up WelfareChecks for each of them. If you would like to support us financially with this, please get in touch at ffdb@fair-fish.net
What is the difference between "not investigated by us yet" and "no data found yet"?
See the question "What does "not investigated by us yet" mean?". In short, if we have not had a look in the literature - or in other words, if we have not investigated a criterion - we cannot know the data. If we have already checked the literature on a criterion and could not find anything, it is "no data found yet". You spotted a "no data found yet" where you know data exists? Get in touch with us at ffdb@fair-fish.net!
General
How to use the FAQ?
First up, you will find answers to questions for the specific page you are on. Scrolling down in the FAQ window, there are also answers to more general questions. Explore our website and the other sub pages and find there the answers to questions relevant for those pages.
How do I navigate in the fair-fish database?
In the fair-fish database, when you have chosen a species (either by searching in the search bar or in the species tree), the landing page is an Overview, introducing the most important information to know about the species that we have come across during our literatures search, including common names, images, distribution, habitat and growth characteristics, swimming aspects, reproduction, social behaviour but also handling details. To dive deeper, visit the Dossier where we collect all available ethological findings (and more) on the most important aspects during the life course, both biologically and concerning the habitat. In contrast to the Overview, we present the findings in more detail citing the scientific references.
Depending on whether the species is farmed or wild caught, you will be interested in different branches of the database.
Farm branch
Founded in 2013, the farm branch of the fair-fish database focuses on farmed aquatic species.
Catch branch
Founded in 2022, the catch branch of the fair-fish database focuses on wild-caught aquatic species.
What is the farm branch?
The heart of the farm branch of the fair-fish database is the welfare assessment – or WelfareCheck | farm – resulting in the WelfareScore | farm for each species. The WelfareCheck | farm is a condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good welfare in aquaculture, based on welfare-related findings for 10 crucial criteria (home range, depth range, migration, reproduction, aggregation, aggression, substrate, stress, malformations, slaughter).
For those species with a Dossier, we conclude to-be-preferred farming conditions in the Advice | farm. They are not meant to be as detailed as a rearing manual but instead, challenge current farming standards and often take the form of what not to do.
What is the catch branch?
In parallel to farm, the main element of the catch branch of the fair-fish database is the welfare assessment – or WelfareCheck | catch – with the WelfareScore | catch for each species caught with a specific catching method. The WelfareCheck | catch, too, is a condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good welfare – or better yet avoidance of decrease of good welfare – this time in fisheries. We base this on findings on welfare hazards in 10 steps along the catching process (prospection, setting, catching, emersion, release from gear, bycatch avoidance, sorting, discarding, storing, slaughter).
In contrast to the farm profiles, in the catch branch we assess the welfare separately for each method that the focus species is caught with. In the case of a species exclusively caught with one method, there will be one WelfareCheck, whereas in other species, there will be as many WelfareChecks as there are methods to catch the species with.
Summarising our findings of all WelfareChecks | catch for one species in Advice | catch, we conclude which catching method is the least welfare threatening for this species and which changes to the gear or the catching process will potentially result in improvements of welfare.
What do we mean by "welfare"?
Welfare of aquatic species is at the heart of the fair-fish database. In our definition of welfare, we follow Broom (1986): “The welfare of an individual is its state as regards its attempts to cope with its environment.” Thus, welfare may be perceived as a continuum on which an individual rates “good” or “poor” or everything in between.
We pursue what could be called a combination of not only a) valuing the freedom from injuries and stress (function-based approach) but b) supporting attempts to provide rewarding experiences and cognitive challenges (feelings-based approach) as well as c) arguing for enclosures that mimic the wild habitat as best as possible and allow for natural behaviour (nature-based approach).
What if I have a question?
Try mousing over the element you are interested in - oftentimes you will find explanations this way. If not, there will be FAQ on many of the sub-pages with answers to questions that apply to the respective sub-page. If your question is not among those, contact us at ffdb@fair-fish.net.
Where is the FishEthoBase?
It's right here! We decided to re-name it to fair-fish database for several reasons. The database has grown beyond dealing purely with ethology, more towards welfare in general – and so much more. Also, the partners fair-fish and FishEthoGroup decided to re-organise their partnership. While maintaining our friendship, we also desire for greater independence. So, the name "fair-fish database" establishes it as a fair-fish endeavour.
Frequently asked questions
«