Information
Author: Jenny Volstorf
Version: B | 1.1Published: 2021-01-23
1 Remarks
1.1 General remarks
Escapees and consequences: negative or at most unpredictable for the local ecosystem1.2 Other remarks
No data found yet.2 Ethograms
In the farm or lab: on daily rhythm, swimming, social behaviour
3 Distribution
Introduced: inland waters worldwide
4 Natural co-existence
5 Substrate and/or shelter
5.1 Substrate
Substrate range, substrate preference: uses substrate for spawning5.2 Shelter or cover
No data found yet.6 Food, foraging, hunting, feeding
6.1 Trophic level and general considerations on food needs
Trophic level: 3.1Impacts of feed fishery: contributes to overfishing, challenges animal welfare
6.2 Food items
Food items, food preference: omnivorous (further research needed)Feed enrichment and stress tolerance: direct effect of levamisole, lipopolysaccharide, beta-glucans, astaxanthin, mannan oligosaccharide (further research needed)
6.3 Feeding behaviour
Feeding style, foraging mode: probably goes mainly by olfaction in foraging (further research needed)Feeding frequency and stress: inverse relation in fry, no effect in juveniles (further research needed)
Feeding frequency and growth: direct relation in juveniles; in fry, feeding time more important (further research needed)
Effects on feeding: inverse relation of time of first feeding, direct effect of feeding time and white tank background colour, no effect of light intensity in fry, reduced appetite at 36 °C (further research needed)
7 Photoperiod
7.1 Daily rhythm
Daily rhythm: fry nocturnal (further research needed)7.2 Light intensity
Light intensity and stress: direct relation in fry, thereafter inverse relation (further research needed)Light intensity and growth: mixed effects in young fry, thereafter direct effect (further research needed)
7.3 Light colour
Light colour and stress: tendency of better survival under yellow and red light in fry, no effect in juveniles (further research needed)Light colour and growth: tendency of higher growth under red and white light (further research needed)
8 Water parameters
8.1 Water temperature
Standard temperature range, temperature preference: 28-32 °C, unclear preferenceTemperature and stress: decreasing survival <28 °C, lower survival after cold (15 °C) and heat shock (42 °C), increasing stress >32 °C (further research needed)
Temperature and growth: optimally 27-34 °C, depending on salinity, no effect of heat shock (42 °C) shortly after fertilisation of eggs (further research needed)
8.2 Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen range: avoids depths with low oxygen (further research needed)8.3 Salinity
Salinity tolerance, standard salinity range: stenohaline, fresh waterSalinity and stress: decreasing survival >10 ppt, but depends on acclimatisation
Salinity and growth: no effect until 10-11 ppt, inverse relation thereafter (further research needed)
8.4 pH
Standard pH range: 6.8-8 (further research needed)8.5 Turbidity
No data found yet.8.6 Water hardness
No data found yet.8.7 NO4
No data found yet.8.8 Other
No data found yet.9 Swimming
9.1 Swimming type, swimming mode
No data found yet.9.2 Swimming speed
Swimming speed: swimming speed in the wild unknown; in the lab, higher speed in green tanks (further research needed)Standard velocity range, velocity preference: fry in 0.2-1 m/s velocity (further research needed)
9.3 Home range
No data found yet.9.4 Depth
Depth range, depth preference: fry 4.5-6 m, juveniles 2-4 m, moves shallower during the dark and during oxygen shortage9.5 Migration
Migration type: potamodromous10 Growth
10.1 Ontogenetic development
Mature egg: 19-36 h from fertilisation until hatching, 1.0-1.8 mm, 0.6-0.7 mgLarvae: hatching to 60-96 h, 2.7-6.8 mm, 0.6 mg
Fry: beginning of exogenous feeding, 1-15 days, 3-13.6 mm, 1-2 mg
Juveniles, sexual maturity: fully developed (14 days) to beginning of maturity (10-19 months), 1.3-14.4 cm, 0.0001-2.2 kg (further research needed)
Adults: 3-4 years, 36-71 cm, 1.2-5.8 kg
10.2 Sexual conversion
No data found yet.10.3 Sex ratio
No data found yet.10.4 Effects on growth
Growth rate: 57.8 cm in first year, 4.8 cm in fourth year (further research needed)Growth and other factors: direct effect of 1:1 polyculture with Hypophthalmichthys molitrix or 1:1 with different carps; no effect of incubator type on hatching; advantage of cages over ponds (further research needed)
For growth and...
...feeding frequency → D14,
...light intensity → D15,
...light colour → D16,
...water temperature → D13,
...salinity → D17,
...tank colour → D18,
...stocking density → D19.
10.5 Deformities and malformations
Deformities and malformations: higher rate of malformed spines after heat shock (42 °C), generally rather diseases than malformations (further research needed)Hypotheses regarding causes for deformities: heat shortly after fertilisation (further research needed)
11 Reproduction
11.1 Nest building
Nest building: none11.2 Attraction, courtship, mating
No data found yet.11.3 Spawning
Spawning conditions: rocks and tree roots, summer to all year, 26-31 °C, fresh water, probably in deep pools (further research needed)Male:female ratio resulting in spawning, composition of the broodstock: 1:1-2:1; 1:1-1:3 (further research needed)
11.4 Fecundity
Female fecundity: range 74,900-1,000,000 eggs/female, 49,000-5,750,000 eggs/kgFecundity and manipulation: pregnant mare gonadotropin serum fastens maturation, Ovaprim, Ovuline, and human chorionic gonadotropin induces breeding (further research needed)
11.5 Brood care, breeding
Breeding type: river spawner, fry drift downstream to nursery grounds (flood plains)12 Senses
12.1 Vision
Visible spectrum: blue, green, yellow, red (further research needed)Importance of vision: swimming, probably not foraging (further research needed)
Tank colour and stress: lower mucous cell count in green tanks (further research needed)
Tank colour and growth: higher in green and white (further research needed)
12.2 Olfaction (and taste, if present)
Importance of olfaction: foraging (further research needed)12.3 Hearing
No data found yet.12.4 Touch, mechanical sensing
No data found yet.12.5 Lateral line
Importance of lateral line: unclear (further research needed)12.6 Electrical sensing
No data found yet.12.7 Nociception, pain sensing
No data found yet.12.8 Other
No data found yet.13 Communication
13.1 Visual
Colouration and habitat: align with dark tanks (further research needed)13.2 Chemical
No data found yet.13.3 Acoustic
No data found yet.13.4 Mechanical
No data found yet.13.5 Electrical
No data found yet.13.6 Other
No data found yet.14 Social behaviour
14.1 Spatial organisation
Aggregation type: school (further research needed)Stocking density and stress: mixed effects in fry, no effect in juveniles (further research needed)
Stocking density and growth: inverse relation from ca >25 ind/m3 on (further research needed)
14.2 Social organisation
No data found yet.14.3 Exploitation
Cannibalism, predation: prevalent in fry, but seems to be unintentional for the most part during the age of 46-105 h14.4 Facilitation
No data found yet.14.5 Aggression
For aggression and light intensity → D22.14.6 Territoriality
No data found yet.15 Cognitive abilities
15.1 Learning
No data found yet.15.2 Memory
No data found yet.15.3 Problem solving, creativity, planning, intelligence
No data found yet.15.4 Other
No data found yet.16 Personality, coping styles
17 Emotion-like states
17.1 Joy
No data found yet.17.2 Relaxation
No data found yet.17.3 Sadness
No data found yet.17.4 Fear
No data found yet.18 Self-concept, self-recognition
19 Reactions to husbandry
19.1 Stereotypical and vacuum activities
No data found yet.19.2 Acute stress
Handling: transfer from boat to factory without water is stressful (further research needed)Live transport: stressful (further research needed)
For acute stress...
...light intensity → D22,
...water temperature → D12.
19.3 Chronic stress
For chronic stress and......feed enrichment → D23,
...feeding frequency → D24,
...light intensity → D22,
...light colour → D25,
...water temperature → D12,
...salinity → D26,
...tank colour → D27,
...stocking density → D28.
19.4 Stunning reactions
Stunning rules: fast, effective, safeStunning methods: percussive and electrical stunning most effective (further research needed)
Glossary
FARM = setting in farming environment or under conditions simulating farming environment in terms of size of facility or number of individuals
FOOD CONVERSION RATIO = (food offered / weight gained)
FRY = larvae from external feeding on
IND = individuals
JUVENILES = fully developed but immature individuals
LAB = setting in laboratory environment
LARVAE = hatching to mouth opening
MILLIARD = 1,000,000,000 30 31
STENOHALINE = tolerant of a narrow range of salinities
TOTAL LENGTH = from snout to tip of caudal fin as compared to fork length (which measures from snout to fork of caudal fin) or standard length (from head to base of tail fin) or body length (from the base of the eye notch to the posterior end of the telson) 34
WILD = setting in the wild
Bibliography
2 Więcaszek, Beata, Sławomir Keszka, Ewa Sobecka, and Walter A. Boeger. 2009. Asian pangasiids--An emerging problem for European inland waters? Systematic and parasitological aspects. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 39: 131–138.
3 Ngor, Peng Bun. 1999. Catfish fry collection in Kandal/Phnom Penh in the Mekong River. Publication 13. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute.
4 Sokheng, Chan, Chhuon Kim Chhea, Sintavong Viravong, Kongpeng Bouakhamvongsa, Ubolratana Suntornratana, Noppanum Yoorong, Nguyen Than Tung, Tran Quoc Bao, Anders F. Poulsen, and John Valbo Jorgensen. 1999. Fish migrations and spawning habits in the Mekong mainstream: a survey using local knowledge (basin-wide). Assessment of Mekong Fisheries: Fish Migrations and Spawning and the Impact of Water Management Project (AMFC). Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission.
5 Srun, Phallavan, and Peng Bun Ngor. 2000. The dry season migration pattern of five Mekong fish species: Riel (Henicorhynchus spp.), Chhkok (Cyclocheilichthys enoplos), Pruol (Cirrhinus microlepis), Pra (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) and Trasork (Probarbus jullieni). In Eleven Presentations given at the Annual Meeting of the Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 27-28 January 2000, 61–89. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Department of Fisheries - Mekong River Commission (MRC)/Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA).
6 Poulsen, Anders F., K. G. Hortle, J. Valbo-Jorgensen, S. Chan, C. K. Chhuon, Sintavong Viravong, Kongpeng Bouakhamvongsa, et al. 2004. Distribution and Ecology of Some Important Riverine Fish Species of the Mekong River Basin. MRC Technical Paper 10. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission.
7 Aida, S.N., and A.D. Utomo. 2015. Striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) (Sauvage, 1878) movement and growth in Gajah Mungkur reservoir, Central Java 21: 27–38.
8 Mukai, Yukinori. 2011. Remarkably high survival rates under dim light conditions in sutchi catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus larvae. Fisheries Science 77: 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-010-0304-9.
9 Nawang, Siti Umey Syahirah Mat, Fui Fui Ching, and Shigeharu Senoo. 2019. Comparison on growth performance, body coloration changes and stress response of juvenile river catfish, Pangasius hypophthalmus reared in different tank background colour. Aquaculture Research 50: 2591–2599. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14215.
10 Morioka, Shinsuke, Kosuke Sano, Phoutsamone Phommachan, and Bounsong Vongvichith. 2010. Growth and morphological development of laboratory-reared larval and juvenile Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. Ichthyological Research 57: 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-009-0140-z.
11 Yusoff, Nor Amira, Muhammad Firdaus Sallehudin, Nai Han Tan, Normawaty Mohammad Noor, and Yukinori Mukai. 2016. Survival and growth rates of sutchi catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) juveniles under different light wavelengths and intensities. Malays. Appl. Biol. 45: 29–36.
12 Islam, Asiful. 2005. Embryonic and larval development of Thai Pangas (Pangasius sutchi Fowler, 1937). Development, Growth & Differentiation 47: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169x.2004.00773.x.
13 Baras, E., J. Slembrouck, C. Cochet, D. Caruso, and M. Legendre. 2010. Morphological factors behind the early mortality of cultured larvae of the Asian catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. Aquaculture 298: 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.10.005.
14 Baras, Etienne, Thomas Raynaud, Jacques Slembrouck, Domenico Caruso, Christophe Cochet, and Marc Legendre. 2011. Interactions between temperature and size on the growth, size heterogeneity, mortality and cannibalism in cultured larvae and juveniles of the Asian catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage). Aquaculture Research 42: 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02619.x.
15 Ut, Vu Ngoc, Nguyen Phi Long, and Tran Suon Ngoc. 2013. Effects of feeding time, rates, and frequencies on survival rate of stripped catfish fry (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fed by freshwater rotifers (Brachionus angularis). In Book of abstracts and short communications, 527. Ghent University, Belgium.
16 Datta, S. N., A. Singh, G. Jassal, and A. Pandey. 2018. A study on induced breeding, embryonic and larval development of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in semi-arid agro-climate. Journal of Environmental Biology 39: 671–676.
17 Mukai, Yukinori, Nai Han Tan, and Leong Seng Lim. 2015. Why is cannibalism less frequent when larvae of sutchi catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus are reared under dim light? Aquaculture Research 46: 1958–1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12353.
18 The Technical Advisory Body for Fisheries Management. 2005. Status of the Mekong Pangasianodon hypophthalmus resources, with special reference to the stock shared between Cambodia and Viet Nam. Mekong Fisheries Management Recommendation 1. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission.
19 Khamees, Najim R., Atheer H. Ali, Jasim M. Abed, and Thamir K. Adday. 2013. First Record of Striped Catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) (Pisces: Pangasiidae) from Inland Waters of Iraq. Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences Special: 184–197.
20 Raman, Ram Prakash, Arvind Mishra, Sanjeevan Kumar, Soni Sahay, Manoj N. Bhagat, and Saurav Kumar. 2013. Introduction of exotic fish species into Indian waters: an overview of benefits, impacts, issues and management. Advances in Fish Research VI: 1–14.
21 Snovsky, Gregory, and Daniel Golani. 2012. The occurrence of an aquarium escapee, Pangasius hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878),(Osteichthys, Siluriformes, Pangasiidae) in Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee), Israel. BioInvasions Records 1: 101–103.
22 Jayaneththi, Hareschandra Bandula. 2015. Record of Iridescent shark catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus Sauvage, 1878 (Siluriformes: Pangasiidae) from Madampa-Lake in Southwest Sri Lanka. Ruhuna Journal of Science 6: 63–68.
23 Zeena, K. V., and K. S. Jameela Beevi. 2013. Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878)–an alien catfish in Muvattupuzha River, Kerala, India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 110: 228–229.
24 Yong, Ding Lee, Bing Wen Low, Alene Ang, Meiling Woo, and Clarissa Ho. 2014. Multiple records of aquatic alien and invasive species in diets of native predators in Singapore. BioInvasions Records 3: 201–205.
25 Froese, R., and D. Pauly. 2014. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org.
26 FAO. 2014. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2014. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
27 Watson, R., Jackie Alder, and Daniel Pauly. 2006. Fisheries for forage fish, 1950 to the present. In On the Multiple Uses of Forage Fish: from Ecosystems to Markets, ed. Jackie Alder and Daniel Pauly, 14:1–20. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 3. Vancouver, Canada: Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia.
28 Mood, A. 2012. Average annual fish capture for species mostly used for fishmeal (2005-2009). fishcount.org.uk.
29 Mood, A., and P. Brooke. 2012. Estimating the Number of Farmed Fish Killed in Global Aquaculture Each Year.
30 Kopf, Von Kristin. 2012. Milliarden vs. Billionen: Große Zahlen. Sprachlog.
31 Weisstein, Eric W. 2018. Milliard. Text. MathWorld - a Wolfram Web resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Milliard.html. Accessed February 2.
32 Slembrouck, J., E. Baras, J. Subagja, L. T. Hung, and M. Legendre. 2009. Survival, growth and food conversion of cultured larvae of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, depending on feeding level, prey density and fish density. Aquaculture 294: 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.04.038.
33 Tran‐Tu, L. C., T. T. T. Hien, R. H. Bosma, L. T. N. Heinsbroek, J. a. J. Verreth, and J. W. Schrama. 2018. Effect of ingredient particle sizes and dietary viscosity on digestion and faecal waste of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus). Aquaculture Nutrition 24: 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12632.
34 Pawson, M.G., and G.D. Pickett. 1996. The Annual Pattern of Condition and Maturity in Bass, Dicentrarchus Labrax, in Waters Around England and Wales. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76: 107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400029040.
35 Bich Hang, Bui Thi, Nguyen Thanh Phuong, and Patrick Kestemont. 2014. Can immunostimulants efficiently replace antibiotic in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) against bacterial infection by Edwardsiella ictaluri? Fish & Shellfish Immunology 40: 556–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2014.08.007.
36 Phu, Tran Minh, Nguyen Thi Kim Ha, Duong Thi My Tien, Tran Son Tuyen, and Do Thi Thanh Huong. 2016. Effect of beta-glucans on hematological, immunoglobulins and stress parameters of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fingerling. Can Tho University Journal of Science 4: 105–113.
37 Gopan, Amrutha, Muralidhar P. Ande, Tincy Varghese, Narottam Prasad Sahu, Syamlal Lalappan, P. P. Srivastava, and K. K. Jain. 2018. Dietary Carotenoid Supplementation Improves Fillet Appearance, Antioxidant Status and Immuneresponses in Striped Catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) Neverthless the Growth Performance. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 18: 1303–1313.
38 Akter, Mst. Nahid, Roshada Hashim, Amalia Sutriana, and Siti Azizah Mohd Nor. 2019. Influence of mannan oligosaccharide supplementation on haematological and immunological responses and disease resistance of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus Sauvage, 1878) juveniles. Aquaculture International 27: 1535–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00408-z.
39 Khan, S., M. S. Hossain, and M. M. Haque. 2009. Effects of feeding schedule on growth, production and economics of pangasiid catfish (Pangasius hypophthalmus) and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) polyculture. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University 7: 175–181. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v7i1.4982.
40 Meilisza, Nina, Yann Moreau, Ettiene Baras, and Rina Hirnawati. 2010. Influence of feeding time on feed utilization by Siamese catfish, Pangasius hypophthalmus juvenile. Indonesian Aquaculture Journal 5: 83–89. https://doi.org/10.15578/iaj.5.1.2010.83-89.
41 Islam, Md. Ariful, Md. Helal Uddin, Md. Jasim Uddin, and Md. Shahjahan. 2019. Temperature changes influenced the growth performance and physiological functions of Thai pangas Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. Aquaculture Reports 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2019.100179.
42 Mukai, Yukinori. 2011. High survival rates of Surchi catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, larvae reared under dark conditions. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 6: 285–290.
43 Tan, Nai Han, Nor Amira Yusoff, Khairul Muttaqin Ismail, Muhammad Firdaus Sallehudin, and Yukinori Mukai. 2017. Influence of light wavelength and intensity on the survival and somatic growth ofthe early larval stage of sutchi catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. International Journal of Aquatic Sciences 8: 113–119.
44 Hartami, Prama, Odang Carman, Muhammad Zairin, and Alimuddin Alimuddin. 2018. Heat Shock and Its Consequences on Early Life Performance of Stripped Catfis (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus). Omni-Akuatika 14: 52–58. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.oa.2018.14.2.542.
45 Nguyen, Trong Hong Phuc. 2015. Effects of temperature and salinity on growth performance in cultured Tra catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) in Vietnam. Doctoral dissertation, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
46 Adloo, Mohammad Nabi, Siyavash Soltanian, Mahmoud Hafeziyeh, and Nastaran Ghadimi. 2015. Cortisol and glucose responses in juvenile striped catfish subjected to a cold shock. Veterinary Science Development 5: 78–81. https://doi.org/10.4081/vsd.2015.5892.
47 Nguyen, Trong Hong Phuc, Peter B. Mather, and David A. Hurwood. 2017. Effects of sublethal salinity and temperature levels and their interaction on growth performance and hematological and hormonal levels in tra catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus). Aquaculture International 25: 1057–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0097-7.
48 Jahan, Afiya, Tanjia Taher Nipa, SM Majharul Islam, Md Helal Uddin, Md Sadiqul Islam, and Md Shahjahan. 2019. Striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) could be suitable for coastal aquaculture. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 35: 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13918.
49 Ali, Lokman, Shahroz Mahean Haque, and Russell J. Borski. 2014. The Culture Potential of Pangasius Catfish in Brackish (Hyposaline) Waters of the Greater Barishal Regions in Southern Bangladesh. Bangladesh: WorldFish Center.
50 Nguyen, Phuc Trong Hong, Huong Thi Thanh Do, Peter B. Mather, and David A. Hurwood. 2014. Experimental assessment of the effects of sublethal salinities on growth performance and stress in cultured tra catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 40: 1839–1848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-014-9972-1.
51 Lefevre, Sjannie, Do Thi Thanh Huong, Nguyen Thi Kim Ha, Tobias Wang, Nguyen Thanh Phuong, and Mark Bayley. 2011. A telemetry study of swimming depth and oxygen level in a Pangasius pond in the Mekong Delta. Aquaculture 315: 410–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.030.
52 Chaturvedi, C. S., W. S. Lakra, R. K. Singh, and A. K. Pandey. 2015. Successful Induced Breeding and Larval Rearing of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus under Controlled Conditions of Chaipur (Chhattisgarh). Uttar Pradesh, India: State Biodiversity Board.
53 Kristanto, A.H., J. Subagja, Jacques Slembrouck, and Marc Legendre. 1998. Effect of eggs incubation technique on hatching rate, hatching kinetic and survival of larvae in the Asian catfish Pangasius hypophthalmus (Siluriformes, Pangasiidae). In The biological diversity and aquaculture of clariid and pangasiid catfishes in South-East Asia : proceedings of the mid-term workshop of the “Catfish Asia project,” ed. Marc Legendre and Antoine Pariselle, 107–111. Jakarta: IRD.
54 Legendre, Marc, J. Subagja, and Jacques Slembrouck. 1998. Absence of marked seasonal variations in sexual maturity of Pangasius hypophthalmus brooders held in ponds at the Sukamandi station (Java, Indonesia). In The biological diversity and aquaculture of clariid and Pangasiid catfishes in South-East Asia: proceedings of the mid-term workshop of the “Catfish Asia project,” ed. Marc Legendre and Antoine Pariselle, 91–96. Jakarta: IRD.
55 Baidya, Arun Prasad, and Shigeharu Senoo. 2002. Observations of Final Oocyte Maturation and Eggs on Patin Pangasius hypophthalmus under Artificial Rearing Conditions. Suisanzoshoku 50: 423–432. https://doi.org/10.11233/aquaculturesci1953.50.423.
56 Mukai, Yukinori, Audrey Daning Tuzan, Leong Seng Lim, and Syahirah Yahaya. 2010. Feeding behavior under dark conditions in larvae of sutchi catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. Fisheries Science 76: 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-010-0237-3.
57 Sah, U., S. K. Wagle, S. N. Mehta, and Y. K. Mukhiya. 2018. Preliminary observations on breeding and fry rearing of pangas (Pangasius hypophthalmus) in eastern terai region of Nepal. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research 3: 14–16.
58 Kristanto, Anang Hari, Jacques Slembrouck, and Marc Legendre. 2005. First sexual maturation and breeding cycle of Pangasius hypophthalmus (Siluriformes, Pangasidae) reared in pond. Indonesian Fisheries Research Journal 11: 53–57. https://doi.org/10.15578/ifrj.11.2.2005.53-57.
59 Moses, T. L. S. Samuel, S. Felix, and Vaitheeswaran Thiruvengadam. 2016. Induced breeding, egg and embryonic development of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) under hatchery conditions of north Tamil Nadu (Chennai). International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture 4: 388–392.
60 Subagja, Jojo, Jacques Slembrouck, Le Thanh Hung, and Marc Legendre. 1999. Larval rearing of an Asian catfish Pangasius hypophthalmus (Siluroidei, Pangasiidae): Analysis of precocious mortality and proposition of appropriate treatments. Aquatic Living Resources 12: 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(99)80013-8.
61 Rahman, Mohammed Mokhlesur, Md Shahidul Islam, Govinda Chandra Halder, and Masaru Tanaka. 2006. Cage culture of sutchi catfish, Pangasius sutchi (Fowler 1937): effects of stocking density on growth, survival, yield and farm profitability. Aquaculture Research 37: 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01390.x.
62 Islam, Md Sherazul, Khandaker Anisul Huq, and Md Anisur Rahman. 2008. Polyculture of Thai pangus (Pangasius hypophthalmus, Sauvage 1878) with carps and prawn: a new approach in polyculture technology regarding growth performance and economic return. Aquaculture Research 39: 1620–1627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02035.x.
63 Datta, S. N., A. Dhawan, S. Kumar, A. Singh, and P. Parida. 2017. Standardization of stocking density for maximizing biomass production of Pangasius pangasius in pond cage aquaculture. Journal of Environmental Biology 38: 237–242.
64 Shafiullah, M., M. Abu Baker Siddique, M. Shadiqur Rahman, Balaram Mahalder, Azhar Ali, and S. M. Rahmatullah. 2019. Effect of different stocking ratios on the production and survival of indigenous carps and pangas (Pangasius hypophthalmus) in a pond system. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 7: 19–24.
65 Pradhan, Sweta. 2013. Polyculture of Thai-pangas (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) and carps with alternate feeding strategies. Master thesis, Rangailunda, Berhampur: Orissa University of Aquaculture and Technology.
66 Kumar, Manish, Kiran Dube, V. K. Tiwari, A. K. Reddy, and T. S. Chaturvedi. 2017. Comparative Performance of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) Culture in Cages and Ponds. International Journal of Current Research in Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6: 1679–1688.
67 Pamungkas, Wahyu, Dedi Jusadi, Muhammad Zairin, Jr., Mia Setiawati, Eddy Supriyono, and Imron Imron. 2019. Induction of ovarian rematuration in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) using pregnant mare serum gonadotropin hormone in out-of spawning season. AACL Bioflux 12: 767–776.
68 Faruk, M. A. R. 2005. Health and disease status of Thai pangas, Pangasius hypophthalmus cultured in rural ponds of Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries Research 9: 51–53.
69 Touch, S. T. 2000. Life cycle of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus and the impact of catch and culture. In , 27. Bogor, Indonesia.
70 Tan, Nai-Han, Yukinori Mukai, Ryo Okawa, and Kazuhiko Anraku. 2018. Visual pigments and spectral sensitivity of juvenile sutchi catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus Sauvage 1878). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 34: 1314–1319. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13792.
71 Ching, F. F., S. Senoo, and G. Kawamura. 2015. Relative Importance of Vision estimated from the Brain pattern in African catfish Clarias gariepinus, river catfish Pangasius pangasius and red tilapia Oreochromis sp. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences 4: 6–10.
72 Sørensen, Nils Kristian. 2005. Slaughtering processes for farmed Pangasius in Vietnam. 12. Fiskeriforskning. Tromsø, Norway: Norwegian Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture Research.
73 Bui, Tam M., N. Thanh Phuong, Gia Hien Nguyen, and Sena S. De Silva. 2013. Fry and fingerling transportation in the striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, farming sector, Mekong Delta, Vietnam: A pivotal link in the production chain. Aquaculture 388–391: 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.01.007.
74 Robb, D H F, and S C Kestin. 2002. Methods Used to Kill Fish: Field Observations and Literature Reviewed. Animal Welfare 11: 269–282.
75 Stamer, Andreas. 2009. Betäubungs- und Schlachtmethoden für Speisefische. Report.
Probably, we updated the profile. Check the version number in the head of the page. For more information on the version, see the FAQ about this. Why do we update profiles? Not just do we want to include new research that has come out, but we are continuously developing the database itself. For example, we changed the structure of entries in criteria or we added explanations for scores in the WelfareCheck | farm. And we are always refining our scoring rules.
The centre of the Overview is an array of criteria covering basic features and behaviours of the species. Each of this information comes from our literature search on the species. If we researched a full Dossier on the species, probably all criteria in the Overview will be covered and thus filled. This was our way to go when we first set up the database.
Because Dossiers are time consuming to research, we switched to focusing on WelfareChecks. These are much shorter profiles covering just 10 criteria we deemed important when it comes to behaviour and welfare in aquaculture (and lately fisheries, too). Also, WelfareChecks contain the assessment of the welfare potential of a species which has become the main feature of the fair-fish database over time. Because WelfareChecks do not cover as many criteria as a Dossier, we don't have the information to fill all blanks in the Overview, as this information is "not investigated by us yet".
Our long-term goal is to go back to researching Dossiers for all species covered in the fair-fish database once we set up WelfareChecks for each of them. If you would like to support us financially with this, please get in touch at ffdb@fair-fish.net
See the question "What does "not investigated by us yet" mean?". In short, if we have not had a look in the literature - or in other words, if we have not investigated a criterion - we cannot know the data. If we have already checked the literature on a criterion and could not find anything, it is "no data found yet". You spotted a "no data found yet" where you know data exists? Get in touch with us at ffdb@fair-fish.net!
Once you have clicked on "show details", the entry for a criterion will unfold and display the summarised information we collected from the scientific literature – complete with the reference(s).
As reference style we chose "Springer Humanities (numeric, brackets)" which presents itself in the database as a number in a grey box. Mouse over the box to see the reference; click on it to jump to the bibliography at the bottom of the page. But what does "[x]-[y]" refer to?
This is the way we mark secondary citations. In this case, we read reference "y", but not reference "x", and cite "x" as mentioned in "y". We try to avoid citing secondary references as best as possible and instead read the original source ourselves. Sometimes we have to resort to citing secondarily, though, when the original source is: a) very old or not (digitally) available for other reasons, b) in a language no one in the team understands. Seldomly, it also happens that we are running out of time on a profile and cannot afford to read the original. As mentioned, though, we try to avoid it, as citing mistakes may always happen (and we don't want to copy the mistake) and as misunderstandings may occur by interpreting the secondarily cited information incorrectly.
If you spot a secondary reference and would like to send us the original work, please contact us at ffdb@fair-fish.net
In general, we aim at giving a good representation of the literature published on the respective species and read as much as we can. We do have a time budget on each profile, though. This is around 80-100 hours for a WelfareCheck and around 300 hours for a Dossier. It might thus be that we simply did not come around to reading the paper.
It is also possible, though, that we did have to make a decision between several papers on the same topic. If there are too many papers on one issue than we manage to read in time, we have to select a sample. On certain topics that currently attract a lot of attention, it might be beneficial to opt for the more recent papers; on other topics, especially in basic research on behaviour in the wild, the older papers might be the go-to source.
And speaking of time: the paper you are missing from the profile might have come out after the profile was published. For the publication date, please check the head of the profile at "cite this profile". We currently update profiles every 6-7 years.
If your paper slipped through the cracks and you would like us to consider it, please get in touch at ffdb@fair-fish.net
This number, for example "C | 2.1 (2022-11-02)", contains 4 parts:
- "C" marks the appearance – the design level – of the profile part. In WelfareChecks | farm, appearance "C" is our most recent one with consistent age class and label (WILD, FARM, LAB) structure across all criteria.
- "2." marks the number of major releases within this appearance. Here, it is major release 2. Major releases include e.g. changes of the WelfareScore. Even if we just add one paper – if it changes the score for one or several criteria, we will mark this as a major update for the profile. With a change to a new appearance, the major release will be re-set to 1.
- ".1" marks the number of minor updates within this appearance. Here, it is minor update 1. With minor updates, we mean changes in formatting, grammar, orthography. It can also mean adding new papers, but if these papers only confirm the score and don't change it, it will be "minor" in our book. With a change to a new appearance, the minor update will be re-set to 0.
- "(2022-11-02)" is the date of the last change – be it the initial release of the part, a minor, or a major update. The nature of the changes you may find out in the changelog next to the version number.
If an Advice, for example, has an initial release date and then just a minor update date due to link corrections, it means that – apart from correcting links – the Advice has not been updated in a major way since its initial release. Please take this into account when consulting any part of the database.
Lorem ipsum
In the fair-fish database, when you have chosen a species (either by searching in the search bar or in the species tree), the landing page is an Overview, introducing the most important information to know about the species that we have come across during our literatures search, including common names, images, distribution, habitat and growth characteristics, swimming aspects, reproduction, social behaviour but also handling details. To dive deeper, visit the Dossier where we collect all available ethological findings (and more) on the most important aspects during the life course, both biologically and concerning the habitat. In contrast to the Overview, we present the findings in more detail citing the scientific references.
Depending on whether the species is farmed or wild caught, you will be interested in different branches of the database.
Farm branch
Founded in 2013, the farm branch of the fair-fish database focuses on farmed aquatic species.
Catch branch
Founded in 2022, the catch branch of the fair-fish database focuses on wild-caught aquatic species.
The heart of the farm branch of the fair-fish database is the welfare assessment – or WelfareCheck | farm – resulting in the WelfareScore | farm for each species. The WelfareCheck | farm is a condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good welfare in aquaculture, based on welfare-related findings for 10 crucial criteria (home range, depth range, migration, reproduction, aggregation, aggression, substrate, stress, malformations, slaughter).
For those species with a Dossier, we conclude to-be-preferred farming conditions in the Advice | farm. They are not meant to be as detailed as a rearing manual but instead, challenge current farming standards and often take the form of what not to do.
In parallel to farm, the main element of the catch branch of the fair-fish database is the welfare assessment – or WelfareCheck | catch – with the WelfareScore | catch for each species caught with a specific catching method. The WelfareCheck | catch, too, is a condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good welfare – or better yet avoidance of decrease of good welfare – this time in fisheries. We base this on findings on welfare hazards in 10 steps along the catching process (prospection, setting, catching, emersion, release from gear, bycatch avoidance, sorting, discarding, storing, slaughter).
In contrast to the farm profiles, in the catch branch we assess the welfare separately for each method that the focus species is caught with. In the case of a species exclusively caught with one method, there will be one WelfareCheck, whereas in other species, there will be as many WelfareChecks as there are methods to catch the species with.
Summarising our findings of all WelfareChecks | catch for one species in Advice | catch, we conclude which catching method is the least welfare threatening for this species and which changes to the gear or the catching process will potentially result in improvements of welfare.
Try mousing over the element you are interested in - oftentimes you will find explanations this way. If not, there will be FAQ on many of the sub-pages with answers to questions that apply to the respective sub-page. If your question is not among those, contact us at ffdb@fair-fish.net.
It's right here! We decided to re-name it to fair-fish database for several reasons. The database has grown beyond dealing purely with ethology, more towards welfare in general – and so much more. Also, the partners fair-fish and FishEthoGroup decided to re-organise their partnership. While maintaining our friendship, we also desire for greater independence. So, the name "fair-fish database" establishes it as a fair-fish endeavour.