homebutton

Rainbow trout

Oncorhynchus mykiss

Oncorhynchus mykiss (Rainbow trout)
enlarge button
Distribution
Distribution map: Oncorhynchus mykiss (Rainbow trout)




Profile status
Dossier:
D (2018-11-15)
WelfareCheck:
F (2022-12-27)
Advice:
F (2018-11-15)
Taxonomy
Order:
Actinopterygii
Class:
Salmoniformes
Family:
Salmonidae
Habitat
Temperature:
D0-20.5 °C
Salinity:
Dfresh to seawater
Photoperiod:
no data found yet
Substrate:
Dyes
Trophic level:
D4.1
Growth
Length:
D40.2-84.6 cm (total length)
Weight:
D1,100-2,100 g
Maturity:
DF2-7 years
Malformations:
Fyes
Morphology:
not investigated by us yet
Swimming
Home range:
D0-15 km
Depth:
D0-100 m
Speed:
D0.3-114.2 cm/s
Migration:
Ddepends
Type:
Dsub-carangiform
Reproduction
Nest building:
Dyes
Courtship:
Dyes
Mating type:
Dpolygyny
Fecundity:
D3,850-7,800 eggs/kg
Brood care:
Dyes
Social behaviour
Aggregation:
Dflexible
Organisation:
Dlinear hierarchy
Aggression:
Dyes
Handling
Farming frequency:
848,051 t/year
Farming stress:
Dyes
Slaughter protocol:
Fyes

Farming remarks

Oncorhynchus mykiss is one of the dominant salmonids farmed in Europe and North America, second only to Salmo salar. In addition, it is one of the most widely studied model fish species in the wild and in captivity. Yet, the living conditions and the husbandry systems that maximise the welfare of this species are still to be defined, developed, and improved. This lack is quite incomprehensible, given the background and the availability of research performed on this species. The low FishEthoScore is mainly due to the need of space and substrate and to high levels of aggression, stress, and high deformations under farming conditions. Grow-out typically takes place in ponds or raceways, sometimes also in cages. There are two strains in O. mykiss: the anadromous one, also called Steelhead trout, and the potamodromous Rainbow trout. Aquaculture populations probably combine genes of both strains. In anadromous FISHES, throughout the life history, morphology, behaviour, and environmental requirements change. Husbandry systems and practices need to take such differences into account in order to achieve and maintain high welfare. The development of new rearing strategies to optimise the husbandry practices as well as handling with special care would be a step forward to solve some specific welfare concerns. Finally, providing feed which contains a lower amount of fish components from wild catch has proven feasible for this species in lab studies, so a protocol for application in farming conditions has to be developed.

For details see: Dossier & WelfareCheck | farm
For recommendations see: Advice | farm
«