Information
Version: B | 1.1 (2022-06-23)
Please note: This part of the profile is currently being revised.
WelfareScore | farm
Condensed assessment of the species' likelihood and potential for good fish welfare in aquaculture, based on ethological findings for 10 crucial criteria.
- Li = Likelihood that the individuals of the species experience good welfare under minimal farming conditions
- Po = Potential of the individuals of the species to experience good welfare under high-standard farming conditions
- Ce = Certainty of our findings in Likelihood and Potential
WelfareScore = Sum of criteria scoring "High" (max. 10)
General remarks
Misgurnus anguillicaudatus is a freshwater fish species native to Asia that is popularly cultured in many East Asian countries. The increasing demand for this coolwater species has caused a major decline in the natural populations. M. anguillicaudatus, which is also used as live bait and a popular ornamental fish, was already introduced in European and North American countries, besides other countries like Australia. It is a fish species with a high invasive potential, and adverse ecological impact after introduction was already registered. M. anguillicaudatus is a demersal fish with natural polyploid individuals that is found in streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, ditches, swamps, and ricefields, usually preferring muddy bottoms, where it can hide in the muck and leaf litter. This fish is considered a fast-growing species with a flexible omnivorous diet and a great tolerance to hypoxia (it can use atmosphere oxygen for respiration), thermal variation, and high stocking density. It has a great commercial demand, with a high-grade nutritious meat that is tender and flavourful, and also a medical value, especially for Chinese medicine. Despite its commercial importance, relevant information about home range, aggression, and aggregation in natural conditions is still missing for this species. Moreover, further research about many information under farming conditions like substrate use, stress response, malformations, aggression, and the stunning and slaughtering process is needed.
1 Home range
Many species traverse in a limited horizontal space (even if just for a certain period of time per year); the home range may be described as a species' understanding of its environment (i.e., its cognitive map) for the most important resources it needs access to.
What is the probability of providing the species' whole home range in captivity?
It is unclear for minimal and high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.2 Depth range
Given the availability of resources (food, shelter) or the need to avoid predators, species spend their time within a certain depth range.
What is the probability of providing the species' whole depth range in captivity?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is high for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a medium amount of evidence.3 Migration
Some species undergo seasonal changes of environments for different purposes (feeding, spawning, etc.), and to move there, they migrate for more or less extensive distances.
What is the probability of providing farming conditions that are compatible with the migrating or habitat-changing behaviour of the species?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is medium for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a medium amount of evidence.4 Reproduction
A species reproduces at a certain age, season, and sex ratio and possibly involving courtship rituals.
What is the probability of the species reproducing naturally in captivity without manipulation of these circumstances?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is medium for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a medium amount of evidence.5 Aggregation
Species differ in the way they co-exist with conspecifics or other species from being solitary to aggregating unstructured, casually roaming in shoals or closely coordinating in schools of varying densities.
What is the probability of providing farming conditions that are compatible with the aggregation behaviour of the species?
It is unclear for minimal and high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.6 Aggression
There is a range of adverse reactions in species, spanning from being relatively indifferent towards others to defending valuable resources (e.g., food, territory, mates) to actively attacking opponents.
What is the probability of the species being non-aggressive and non-territorial in captivity?
There are no findings for minimal and high-standard farming conditions.7 Substrate
Depending on where in the water column the species lives, it differs in interacting with or relying on various substrates for feeding or covering purposes (e.g., plants, rocks and stones, sand and mud, turbidity).
What is the probability of providing the species' substrate and shelter needs in captivity?
It is low for minimal farming conditions. It is high for high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a medium amount of evidence.8 Stress
Farming involves subjecting the species to diverse procedures (e.g., handling, air exposure, short-term confinement, short-term crowding, transport), sudden parameter changes or repeated disturbances (e.g., husbandry, size-grading).
What is the probability of the species not being stressed?
There are no findings for minimal and high-standard farming conditions.9 Malformations
Deformities that – in contrast to diseases – are commonly irreversible may indicate sub-optimal rearing conditions (e.g., mechanical stress during hatching and rearing, environmental factors unless mentioned in crit. 3, aquatic pollutants, nutritional deficiencies) or a general incompatibility of the species with being farmed.
What is the probability of the species being malformed rarely?
It is unclear for minimal and high-standard farming conditions. Our conclusion is based on a low amount of evidence.10 Slaughter
The cornerstone for a humane treatment is that slaughter a) immediately follows stunning (i.e., while the individual is unconscious), b) happens according to a clear and reproducible set of instructions verified under farming conditions, and c) avoids pain, suffering, and distress.
What is the probability of the species being slaughtered according to a humane slaughter protocol?
There are no findings for minimal and high-standard farming conditions.Side note: Domestication
Teletchea and Fontaine introduced 5 domestication levels illustrating how far species are from having their life cycle closed in captivity without wild input, how long they have been reared in captivity, and whether breeding programmes are in place.
What is the species’ domestication level?
DOMESTICATION LEVEL 2 29, level 5 being fully domesticated.
Side note: Forage fish in the feed
450-1,000 milliard wild-caught fishes end up being processed into fish meal and fish oil each year which contributes to overfishing and represents enormous suffering. There is a broad range of feeding types within species reared in captivity.
To what degree may fish meal and fish oil based on forage fish be replaced by non-forage fishery components (e.g., poultry blood meal) or sustainable sources (e.g., soybean cake)?
All age classes: WILD: omnivorous: smaller and younger IND are more carnivorous, larger and older ones are more herbivorous 30-23 31-10 12, in non-native waters: feeding on macroinvertebrates 17 15 18, detritus 17 18, and vegetation 18; considered as generalist BENTHIC macroinvertebrate feeder 16. FARM: no data found yet. LAB: detritus feeder 23. Fish oil may be completely* replaced by sustainable sources 32.
*partly = <51% – mostly = 51-99% – completely = 100%.
Glossary
BENTHIC = living at the bottom of a body of water, able to rest on the floor
DEMERSAL = living and feeding on or near the bottom of a body of water, mostly benthopelagic, some benthic
DOMESTICATION LEVEL 2 = part of the life cycle closed in captivity, also known as capture-based aquaculture 29
FARM = setting in farming environment or under conditions simulating farming environment in terms of size of facility or number of individuals
FRY = larvae from external feeding on, for details ➝ Findings 10.1 Ontogenetic development
IND = individuals
JUVENILES = fully developed but immature individuals, for details ➝ Findings 10.1 Ontogenetic development
LAB = setting in laboratory environment
LARVAE = hatching to mouth opening, for details ➝ Findings 10.1 Ontogenetic development
PHOTOPERIOD = duration of daylight
PLANKTONIC = horizontal movement limited to hydrodynamic displacement
POTAMODROMOUS = migrating within fresh water
SPAWNERS = adults during the spawning season; in farms: adults that are kept as broodstock
WILD = setting in the wild
Bibliography
2 Wang, Y., M. Hu, L. Cao, Y. Yang, and W. Wang. 2008. Effects of daphnia (Moina micrura) plus chlorella (Chlorella pyrenoidosa) or microparticle diets on growth and survival of larval loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus). Aquaculture International 16: 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9150-x.
3 Wang, Y., M. Hu, W. Wang, and L. Cao. 2009. Effects on growth and survival of loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) larvae when co-fed on live and microparticle diets. Aquaculture Research 40: 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02104.x.
4 Wang, Y., M. Hu, W. Wang, S. G. Cheung, P. K. S. Shin, and L. Cao. 2010. Effects of the timing of initial feeding on growth and survival of loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) larvae. Aquaculture International 18: 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9231-5.
5 Wang, C.-L., Z.-Y. Wang, C.-W. Song, S. Luo, X.-Y. Yuan, Y.-Y Huang, and H. E. Desouky. 2021. A comparative study on growth, muscle cellularity and flesh quality of farmed and imitative ecological farming loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. Aquaculture 543: 736933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736933.
6 Fujimoto, Y., Y. Ouchi, T. Hakuba, H. Chiba, and M. Iwata. 2008. Influence of modern irrigation, drainage system and water management on spawning migration of mud loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus C. Environmental Biology of Fishes 81: 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9188-7.
7 Suzuki, R. 1983. Multiple spawning of the cyprinid loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. Aquaculture 31: 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90315-0.
8 Wang, Y., M. Hu, W. Wang, L. Cao, Y. Yang, B. Lü, and R. Yao. 2008. Transpositional feeding rhythm of loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus from larvae to juveniles and its ontogenesis under artificial rearing conditions. Aquaculture International 16: 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9164-4.
9 Kottelat, Maurice. 1998. Fishes of the Nam Theun and Xe Bangfai basins (Laos), with diagnoses of a new genus and twenty new species (Cyprinidae, Balitoridae, Cobitidae, Coiidae and Eleotrididae). Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters 9: 1–198.
10 Froese, R., and D. Pauly. 2021. Misgurnus anguillicaudatus, Pond loach: fisheries, aquaculture, aquarium, bait. World Wide Web electronic publication. FishBase.
11 Naruse, M., and T. Oishi. 1996. Annual and daily activity rhythms of loathes in an irrigation creek and ditches around paddy fields. Environmental Biology of Fishes 47: 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002382.
12 Katano, O., K. Hosoya, K. Iguchi, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Aonuma, and S. Kitano. 2003. Species diversity and abundance of freshwater fishes in irrigation ditches around rice fields. Environmental Biology of Fishes 66: 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023678401886.
13 Kano, Y., Y. Kawaguchi, T. Yamashita, and Y. Shimatani. 2010. Distribution of the oriental weatherloach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus, in paddy fields and its implications for conservation in Sado Island, Japan. Ichthyological Research 57: 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-009-0146-6.
14 Feng, B., S. V. Yi, R. Li, and X. Zhou. 2017. Comparison of age and growth performance of diploid and tetraploid loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus in the Yangtze River basin, China. Environmental Biology of Fishes 100: 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-017-0608-z.
15 Kessel, N. V., M. Dorenbosch, Ben Crombaghs, Bart Niemeijer, and E. Binnendijk. 2013. First record of Asian weather loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cantor, 1842) in the River Meuse basin. BioInvasions Records 2: 167–171. https://doi.org/10.3391/BIR.2013.2.2.14.
16 Schmidt, R. E., and A. J. Schmidt. 2014. Observations on Oriental Weatherfish (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus), an Exotic Species in the Hudson River Valley, New York. Northeastern Naturalist 21: 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1656/045.021.0113.
17 Tabor, R. A., E. Warner, and S. Hager. 2001. An oriental weatherfish (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) population established in Washington State. NorthWest Science 75: 72–76.
18 Urquhart, A. N., and P. Koetsier. 2013. Diet of a Cryptic but Widespread Invader, the Oriental Weatherfish (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) in Idaho, USA. Western North American Naturalist 74: 92–98. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.074.0109.
19 Saitoh, K., O. Katano, and A. Koizumi. 1988. Movement and spawning of several freshwater fishes in temporary waters around paddy fields. Japanese Journal of Ecology 38: 35–47.
20 Saitoh, K. 1989. Dojou: Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. In Freshwater fishes of Japan, 382–385. Tokyo, Japan: Yamakei,.
21 Tanaka, M. 1999. Influence of different aquatic habitats on distribution and population density of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus in paddy fields. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 46: 75–81.
22 Urquhart, A. N., and P. Koetsier. 2011. Pectoral Fin Morphology as a Reliable Field Sexing Characteristic in Populations of the Invasive Oriental Weatherfish (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus). Copeia 2011: 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-10-027.
23 Watanabe, K., and T. Hidaka. 1983. Feeding behaviour of the Japanese loach,Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cobitididae). Journal of Ethology 1: 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347834.
24 Fengyu, L., and W. Bingxian. 1990. Studies on reproduction and growth of loach. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 1: 60–67.
25 Honda, H. 1980. Female Sex Pheromone of the Loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus, Involved in Courtship Behaviour. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 46: 1223–1225. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.46.1223.
26 Yan, J., C. Guo, M. A. O. Dawood, and J. Gao. 2017. Effects of dietary chitosan on growth, lipid metabolism, immune response and antioxidant-related gene expression in Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. Beneficial Microbes 8: 439–449. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2016.0177.
27 Franch, N., M. Clavero, M. Garrido, N. Gaya, V. López, Q. Pou-Rovira, and J. M. Queral. 2008. On the establishment and range expansion of oriental weatherfish (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) in NE Iberian Peninsula. Biological Invasions 10: 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9207-9.
28 Xu, Z. K., and J. L. Pan. 2005. Key, Dificulty and Examples of Nonpolluting Culturing Misgurnus Anguillicaudatus and Monopterus albus. Beijing, China: Scientific and Technical Documents Press.
29 Teletchea, Fabrice, and Pascal Fontaine. 2012. Levels of domestication in fish: implications for the sustainable future of aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries 15: 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12006.
30 Kubota, Z. 1961. Ecology of the Japanese loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cantor)-I1. Food habit. Journal of the Shimonoseki University of Fisheries 11: 177–195.
31 Yamamoto, M. N., and A. W. Tagawa. 2000. Hawaii s native and exotic freshwater animals. Honolulu, Hawaii: Mutual Publishing.
32 Li, Y., Z. Jia, X. Liang, D. Matulic, M. Hussein, and J. Gao. 2018. Growth performance, fatty-acid composition, lipid deposition and hepatic-lipid metabolism-related gene expression in juvenile pond loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus fed diets with different dietary soybean oil levels. Journal of Fish Biology 92: 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13472.